Insider/Outsider Debate

To me, the insider outsider debate is very interesting. I find that there are many valid points on each side. Overall, I believe that this debate is situational. Each piece of multicultural literature must be evaluated individually. The topic, the author's context, and the readers lens are all important aspects when evaluating multicultural literature. After reading the required articles, I found many interesting arguments in each one. This prompt will focus on the debate found in the first three articles.
Patrick Shannon, who I most identify with culturally, writes how he is unsure if he is able to critically write on the topic of multiculturalism. He openly targets himself as an oppressor and asks if it is possible for him to be accepted as a multicultural author. As a student discussing these sensitive topics I recognize his concerns.
Our second author, Rudine Sims Bishop replies to Shannon's question to tell him that as the oppressor he is at the center of this multicultural storm, however, it is best to let multicultural literature remain written by those culture. "I do know the difference between race and culture, and what I tried to say is that you have to know a culture intimately if you're going to reflect it accurately in your fiction" (Sims Bishop, p. 73).
The last author, Violet Harris is most interesting to me because of her inconsistencies. She references Cornel West in a positive manner by explaining how "prophetic criticism" includes seeking truth by an examination process, which engages in self criticism. However, one paragraph later she criticize Patrick Shannon for labeling himself as a "white, heterosexual, able-bodied, and able-minded male..." (Shannon, 1). Shannon targets himself as the cannon of oppression, is this not self criticism? Also in her article, Harris writes that no invitations are needed to write about multicultural literature, but she gives no suggestions on how the oppressor can authentically approach such sensitive topics.
In the end, I have found that I am always interested to learn about other cultures, but I am critical of my sources. No matter what race or culture, I want my references to be well researched in their subject matter. And as for me, I do not even think I know enough about my culture to reflect it accurately. I know about me and that is what I can reflect.